"...there were rows upon rows of pews, old oak polished to a shine--and far, far above that, the flight of gray stone carved into arches. Pillars formed shadowed corridors; windows soared on the wall beyond. The flagstones gleamed. There was sunlight all around and dust in the air and a stillness that had weight."

HAHAHAHA
That’s not an Oxford comma. No one is in favor of eliminating commas that follow interjections. The Oxford comma is the comma that follows the second to last item in a list—for example, the one after stupid:
The “committee to publicly shame and humiliate Adam Robertson” makes posts that are pretentious, stupid, and wrong.
How’s that for an unambiguous sentence?
(Source: extrememediocrity, via lifeisoriginal-deactivated20120)
Of course… that isn’t actually an Oxford comma… but nice try.
That is NOT an oxford comma…
Enough said. Also, who’s Adam Robertson?
As shown in the graphic, that is just common use of commas, similar to “Let’s eat, Grandma!” and “Let’s eat Grandma!”...
But is the comma as shown there an Oxford comma? Or is there some other name for it?
WOW! You’re the first to tell me that! Thank you! :DDDDDDDDDD
what worries me about this is that apparently there are some people out there who think they nobly protesting an entire...